# docker-pi-hole vs Teleport

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Teleport |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 40 in Authentication |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 21 038 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +102 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v18.10.0 · 8 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Teleport, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Teleport.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Teleport needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Teleport](https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/teleport.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-teleport