docker-pi-holevsSuwayomi-Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Suwayomi-Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 4 in Manga Reader |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 7 962 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +217 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 7 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.4.2366 · 30 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Java |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 71/100 for Suwayomi-Server, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Suwayomi-Server.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Suwayomi-Server needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →Suwayomi-Server details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Suwayomi-Server, compare it with