# docker-pi-hole vs SSH & Web Terminal

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | SSH & Web Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #30 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 ✓ | 542 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 19 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v24.2.0 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 60/100 for SSH & Web Terminal, so it is the safer default.

SSH & Web Terminal ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; SSH & Web Terminal needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [SSH & Web Terminal](https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ssh-web-terminal.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-ssh-web-terminal