docker-pi-holevsspotify-saver
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | spotify-saver | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #35 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 169 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 0.7.5 · 23 Nov 2025 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 44/100 for spotify-saver, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for spotify-saver.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; spotify-saver needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →spotify-saver details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep spotify-saver, compare it with