# docker-pi-hole vs Signal TLS Proxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Signal TLS Proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #16 of 25 in Proxy |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 ✓ | 1 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 49/100 for Signal TLS Proxy, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Signal TLS Proxy.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Signal TLS Proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/signal-tls-proxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-signal-tls-proxy