docker-pi-holevsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 35 502 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +1 770 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 5 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 770 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with