docker-pi-holevsRocket.Chat
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Rocket.Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 13 in Instant Messaging |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 46 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +187 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 36 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 8.5.4 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Rocket.Chat scores 82/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Rocket.Chat ships more often: 36 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Rocket.Chat needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →Rocket.Chat details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Rocket.Chat, compare it with