# docker-pi-hole vs ReadMeABook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | ReadMeABook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 64/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 ✓ | 1 033 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +65 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 21 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.2.12 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 64/100 for ReadMeABook, so it is the safer default.

ReadMeABook ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; ReadMeABook needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [ReadMeABook](https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/readmeabook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-readmeabook