# docker-pi-hole vs QloApps

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | QloApps |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 8 in Scheduling & Booking |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 14 452 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +66 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | OSL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 68/100 for QloApps, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for QloApps.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; QloApps needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [QloApps](https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qloapps.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-qloapps