# docker-pi-hole vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 ✓ | 6 973 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +232 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

Pulse is growing faster right now (+232 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-pulse