# docker-pi-hole vs Proton Mail Bridge

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Proton Mail Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #11 of 33 in Communication |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 ✓ | 1 575 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.27.1 · 8 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 60/100 for Proton Mail Bridge, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Proton Mail Bridge.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Proton Mail Bridge needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Proton Mail Bridge](https://selfhost.directory/project/proton-bridge) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/proton-bridge.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-proton-bridge