# docker-pi-hole vs Plausible Analytics

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Plausible Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 29 704 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +508 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 3 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Plausible Analytics needs more configuration.

Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+508 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Plausible Analytics](https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/plausible-analytics.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-plausible-analytics