docker-pi-holevsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 29 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +508 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 3 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Plausible Analytics needs more configuration.
Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+508 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Plausible Analytics details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Plausible Analytics, compare it with