# docker-pi-hole vs Percona Server for MySQL

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Percona Server for MySQL |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #26 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 11 725 ✓ | 1 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | C |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Percona Server for MySQL, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Percona Server for MySQL.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Percona Server for MySQL needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Percona Server for MySQL](https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/percona-server-for-mysql.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-percona-server-for-mysql