docker-pi-holevsPercona Server for MySQL
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Percona Server for MySQL | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #26 of 38 in Databases |
| GitHub stars | 11 725 | 1 280 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | C |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 61/100 for Percona Server for MySQL, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Percona Server for MySQL.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Percona Server for MySQL needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Percona Server for MySQL details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Percona Server for MySQL, compare it with