# docker-pi-hole vs penpot

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | penpot |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 84/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 61 809 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +1 467 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Clojure |

## Which one should you pick?

penpot scores 84/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.

penpot is growing faster right now (+1 467 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [penpot](https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/penpot.md)

## Related comparisons

- [OpenDesign vs penpot](https://selfhost.directory/compare/open-design-vs-penpot)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-penpot