docker-pi-holevspenpot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | penpot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 30 in Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 61 805 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +1 463 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | 2.18.5 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Clojure |
Which one should you pick?
penpot scores 84/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; penpot needs more configuration.
penpot is growing faster right now (+1 463 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →penpot details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep penpot, compare it with