docker-pi-holevsopenwhisk
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | openwhisk | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 11 725 | 6 803 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +112 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Scala |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 67/100 for openwhisk, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for openwhisk.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; openwhisk needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+112 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →openwhisk details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep openwhisk, compare it with