# docker-pi-hole vs openvpn_webpanel_manager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | openvpn_webpanel_manager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #50 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 ✓ | 297 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | 4.0.1 · 4 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 39/100 for openvpn_webpanel_manager, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; openvpn_webpanel_manager needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [openvpn_webpanel_manager](https://selfhost.directory/project/openvpnwebpanelmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/openvpnwebpanelmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-openvpnwebpanelmanager