docker-pi-holevsOpenReader
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | OpenReader | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 15 in Audiobook Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 550 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +35 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 18 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v5.3.0 · 20 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 59/100 for OpenReader, so it is the safer default.
OpenReader ships more often: 18 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; OpenReader needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →OpenReader details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep OpenReader, compare it with