# docker-pi-hole vs Open-WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Open-WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 90/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 157 126 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +4 036 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 24 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.12.5 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Open-WebUI scores 90/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

Open-WebUI ships more often: 24 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Open-WebUI needs more configuration.

Open-WebUI is growing faster right now (+4 036 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Open-WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/open-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/open-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-open-webui