docker-pi-holevsOpen-WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Open-WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 157 116 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +4 026 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 23 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.12.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Open-WebUI scores 90/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Open-WebUI ships more often: 23 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Open-WebUI needs more configuration.
Open-WebUI is growing faster right now (+4 026 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Open-WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Open-WebUI, compare it with