docker-pi-holevsNomad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Nomad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 11 in Container Orchestration |
| GitHub stars | 11 726 | 17 047 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +78 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 16 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v2.0.7 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 76/100 for Nomad, so it is the safer default.
Nomad ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Nomad needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole details →Nomad details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Nomad, compare it with