# docker-pi-hole vs nati.ve

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | nati.ve |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #21 of 34 in File Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 ✓ | 727 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Kotlin |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 48/100 for nati.ve, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for nati.ve.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; nati.ve needs more configuration.

docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [nati.ve](https://selfhost.directory/project/native) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/native.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-native