docker-pi-holevsmagic-frame
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | magic-frame | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 52/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #58 of 104 in Home Automation |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 511 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 21 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.5.10 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 52/100 for magic-frame, so it is the safer default.
magic-frame ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; magic-frame needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →magic-frame details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep magic-frame, compare it with