docker-pi-holevsLiquidsoap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Liquidsoap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #9 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 9 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+115 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Liquidsoap details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with