docker-pi-holevsLanLens
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | LanLens | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #35 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 147 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 13 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.6.0 · 24 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 45/100 for LanLens, so it is the safer default.
LanLens ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; LanLens needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+113 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →LanLens details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep LanLens, compare it with