# docker-pi-hole vs Kokoro FastAPI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Kokoro FastAPI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #4 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 ✓ | 5 607 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +132 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 14 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.9.1 · 28 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 69/100 for Kokoro FastAPI, so it is the safer default.

Kokoro FastAPI ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Kokoro FastAPI](https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/kokoro-fastapi.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-kokoro-fastapi