# docker-pi-hole vs Infisical

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Infisical |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 78/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 12 in Secrets Management |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 30 123 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 | +707 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 79 ✓ |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.167.4 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Infisical scores 78/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.

Infisical ships more often: 79 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Infisical needs more configuration.

Infisical is growing faster right now (+707 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Infisical](https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/infisical.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-infisical