docker-pi-holevshls-restream-proxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | hls-restream-proxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #42 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 255 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Python |
Which one should you pick?
docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 46/100 for hls-restream-proxy, so it is the safer default.
docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hls-restream-proxy.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; hls-restream-proxy needs more configuration.
docker-pi-hole is growing faster right now (+114 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →hls-restream-proxy details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep hls-restream-proxy, compare it with