# docker-pi-hole vs Healthchecks

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Healthchecks |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #2 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 ✓ | 10 468 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +113 ✓ | +106 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 12 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v5.0.3 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Healthchecks, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Healthchecks needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Healthchecks](https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/healthchecks.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-healthchecks