# docker-pi-hole vs growthbook

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | growthbook |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags |
| GitHub stars | 11 729 ✓ | 8 547 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +122 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [growthbook](https://selfhost.directory/project/growthbook) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/growthbook.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-growthbook