docker-pi-holevsgrafana
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 90/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 77 575 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +701 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 53 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Shell | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
grafana scores 90/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; grafana needs more configuration.
grafana is growing faster right now (+701 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →grafana details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep grafana, compare it with