# docker-pi-hole vs Fish Speech

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | docker-pi-hole | Fish Speech |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 9 in Text to Speech |
| GitHub stars | 11 727 | 33 454 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +114 | +131 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | Other |
| Main language | Shell | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

docker-pi-hole scores 77/100 against 73/100 for Fish Speech, so it is the safer default.

docker-pi-hole ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Fish Speech.

If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Fish Speech needs more configuration.

## Details

- [docker-pi-hole](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-pi-hole.md)
- [Fish Speech](https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/fish-speech.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-pi-hole-vs-fish-speech