docker-pi-holevsFabric
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| docker-pi-hole | Fabric | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 41 in DNS | #3 of 120 in AI Assistant |
| GitHub stars | 11 728 | 44 482 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +115 | +428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 111 |
| Latest release | 2026.10.0 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.4.556 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Shell | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Fabric scores 82/100 against 77/100 for docker-pi-hole, so it is the safer default.
Fabric ships more often: 111 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for docker-pi-hole.
If you want the quickest setup, docker-pi-hole is easier to run; Fabric needs more configuration.
Fabric is growing faster right now (+428 stars in 30 days).
docker-pi-hole details →Fabric details →
Swap a project
Keep docker-pi-hole, compare it with
Keep Fabric, compare it with