# Docker Engine vs Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Docker Engine | Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #4 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 72 220 ✓ | 16 059 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +244 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 31 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | w2026-10-23 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Docker Engine and Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) score the same (80/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Docker Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.

Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is growing faster right now (+244 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Docker Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine.md)
- [Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)](https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zed-attack-proxy-zap.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-engine-vs-zed-attack-proxy-zap