# Docker Engine vs Winter CMS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Docker Engine | Winter CMS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #16 of 42 in Content Management |
| GitHub stars | 72 222 ✓ | 1 522 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +89 ✓ | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 7 |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.14 · 19 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Docker Engine scores 80/100 against 62/100 for Winter CMS, so it is the safer default.

Docker Engine ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Winter CMS.

If you want the quickest setup, Winter CMS is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.

Docker Engine is growing faster right now (+89 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Docker Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine.md)
- [Winter CMS](https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/winter-cms.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-engine-vs-winter-cms