# Docker Engine vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Docker Engine | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 72 220 ✓ | 35 793 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +868 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 80/100 for Docker Engine, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Docker Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, SeaweedFS is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+868 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Docker Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-engine-vs-seaweedfs