# Docker Engine vs Reactive Resume

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Docker Engine | Reactive Resume |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 72 220 ✓ | 45 002 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +1 629 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 34 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.0.7 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Reactive Resume scores 87/100 against 80/100 for Docker Engine, so it is the safer default.

Reactive Resume ships more often: 34 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Docker Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, Reactive Resume is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.

Reactive Resume is growing faster right now (+1 629 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Docker Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine.md)
- [Reactive Resume](https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/reactive-resume.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-engine-vs-reactive-resume