# Docker Engine vs Pulse

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Docker Engine | Pulse |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 11 in Container Orchestration | #2 of 19 in Infrastructure Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 72 220 ✓ | 6 968 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +88 | +227 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 43 ✓ |
| Latest release | docker-v29.9.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | helm-chart-6.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Docker Engine scores 80/100 against 71/100 for Pulse, so it is the safer default.

Pulse ships more often: 43 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for Docker Engine.

If you want the quickest setup, Pulse is easier to run; Docker Engine needs more configuration.

Pulse is growing faster right now (+227 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Docker Engine](https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/docker-engine.md)
- [Pulse](https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/pulse.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/docker-engine-vs-pulse