# Dittofeed vs laudspeaker

> Two self-hosted [Customer.io alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/customerio), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Dittofeed | laudspeaker |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 60/100 ✓ | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 12 in Marketing Automation | #2 of 3 in Customer Engagement |
| GitHub stars | 3 026 ✓ | 2 630 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +64 ✓ | +3 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Dittofeed scores 60/100 against 48/100 for laudspeaker, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Dittofeed is easier to run; laudspeaker needs more configuration.

Dittofeed is growing faster right now (+64 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Dittofeed](https://selfhost.directory/project/dittofeed) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/dittofeed.md)
- [laudspeaker](https://selfhost.directory/project/laudspeaker) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/laudspeaker.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/dittofeed-vs-laudspeaker