DispatcharrvsUrbit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Dispatcharr | Urbit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 72/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 118 in Media Server | #3 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 4 421 | 3 622 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +306 | +5 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.33.0 · 24 Oct 2026 | 408k-2 · 4 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | hoon |
Which one should you pick?
Dispatcharr scores 72/100 against 63/100 for Urbit, so it is the safer default.
Dispatcharr ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Urbit.
If you want the quickest setup, Dispatcharr is easier to run; Urbit needs more configuration.
Dispatcharr is growing faster right now (+306 stars in 30 days).
Dispatcharr details →Urbit details →
Swap a project
Keep Dispatcharr, compare it with
Keep Urbit, compare it with