diskovervsRustFS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| diskover | RustFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 1 825 | 35 499 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +1 767 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 5 |
| Latest release | v2.3.5 · 19 Feb 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
RustFS scores 74/100 against 59/100 for diskover, so it is the safer default.
RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for diskover.
RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 767 stars in 30 days).
diskover details →RustFS details →
Swap a project
Keep diskover, compare it with
Keep RustFS, compare it with