diskovervsPi-hole
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| diskover | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 59/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #9 of 34 in File Management | #1 of 41 in DNS |
| GitHub stars | 1 825 | 61 541 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +5 | +497 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 6 |
| Latest release | v2.3.5 · 19 Feb 2026 | v6.5 · 17 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Other |
| Main language | PHP | Shell |
Which one should you pick?
Pi-hole scores 87/100 against 59/100 for diskover, so it is the safer default.
Pi-hole ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for diskover.
If you want the quickest setup, Pi-hole is easier to run; diskover needs more configuration.
Pi-hole is growing faster right now (+497 stars in 30 days).
diskover details →Pi-hole details →
Swap a project
Keep diskover, compare it with
Keep Pi-hole, compare it with