DiscoursevsZammad
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Discourse | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 | 70/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 48 025 | 6 046 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | +99 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 0 |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Discourse scores 83/100 against 70/100 for Zammad, so it is the safer default.
Discourse ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Zammad.
If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; Zammad needs more configuration.
Discourse details →Zammad details →