# Discourse vs wraft

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | wraft |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #35 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 48 026 ✓ | 167 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +130 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | v0.6.7 · 25 Sept 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Elixir |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 44/100 for wraft, so it is the safer default.

wraft ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; wraft needs more configuration.

Discourse is growing faster right now (+130 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [wraft](https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wraft.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-wraft