# Discourse vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 48 026 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Ruby | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

Discourse is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-uusec-waf