# Discourse vs trusted-cgi

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | trusted-cgi |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #4 of 7 in Serverless |
| GitHub stars | 48 025 ✓ | 249 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +136 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 45/100 for trusted-cgi, so it is the safer default.

Discourse ships more often: 1 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for trusted-cgi.

If you want the quickest setup, trusted-cgi is easier to run; Discourse needs more configuration.

Discourse is growing faster right now (+136 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [trusted-cgi](https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/trusted-cgi.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-trusted-cgi