# Discourse vs speech-to-phrase

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | speech-to-phrase |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #6 of 11 in Voice Assistants |
| GitHub stars | 48 024 ✓ | 348 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +135 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 2 ✓ |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 ✓ | v1.4.3 · 3 Apr 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 46/100 for speech-to-phrase, so it is the safer default.

speech-to-phrase ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; speech-to-phrase needs more configuration.

Discourse is growing faster right now (+135 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [speech-to-phrase](https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/speech-to-phrase.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-speech-to-phrase