# Discourse vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Discourse | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 83/100 ✓ | 74/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 48 026 ✓ | 35 504 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | +1 772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 5 ✓ |
| Latest release | _gh-attach-assets · 15 Jul 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Discourse scores 83/100 against 74/100 for RustFS, so it is the safer default.

RustFS ships more often: 5 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Discourse.

If you want the quickest setup, Discourse is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Discourse](https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/discourse.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

## Related comparisons

- [Discourse vs Rocket.Chat](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rocketchat)
- [Discourse vs Zulip](https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-zulip)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/discourse-vs-rustfs